Trancendental Arguments
See arguments.
Trancendental arguments comes out of modal logic. Given the first premise, it reduces to a modus ponens.
$$ Y \implies \Box X $$$$ Y $$$$ \therefore X $$Why is this not just affirming the consequent?
See arguments.
Trancendental arguments comes out of modal logic. Given the first premise, it reduces to a modus ponens.
$$ Y \implies \Box X $$$$ Y $$$$ \therefore X $$Why is this not just affirming the consequent?